Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.023
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 152: e60, 2024 Apr 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584132

RESUMEN

Previous studies suggest that influenza virus infection may provide temporary non-specific immunity and hence lower the risk of non-influenza respiratory virus infection. In a randomized controlled trial of influenza vaccination, 1 330 children were followed-up in 2009-2011. Respiratory swabs were collected when they reported acute respiratory illness and tested against influenza and other respiratory viruses. We used Poisson regression to compare the incidence of non-influenza respiratory virus infection before and after influenza virus infection. Based on 52 children with influenza B virus infection, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of non-influenza respiratory virus infection after influenza virus infection was 0.47 (95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.82) compared with before infection. Simulation suggested that this IRR was 0.87 if the temporary protection did not exist. We identified a decreased risk of non-influenza respiratory virus infection after influenza B virus infection in children. Further investigation is needed to determine if this decreased risk could be attributed to temporary non-specific immunity acquired from influenza virus infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Herpesviridae , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae , Orthomyxoviridae , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Niño , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Virus de la Influenza B , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2327736, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513689

RESUMEN

The objective of the study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 booster vaccination when co-administered with an egg-based standard dose seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). This was a phase 3, randomized, open-label study. Eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mRNA-1273 (50 µg) booster vaccination and QIV 2 weeks apart (Seq group) or concomitantly (Coad group). Primary objectives were non-inferiority of haemagglutinin inhibition (HI) and anti-Spike protein antibody responses in the Coad compared to Seq group. 497/498 participants were randomized and vaccinated in the Seq/Coad groups, respectively. The adjusted geometric mean titer/concentration ratios (95% confidence intervals) (Seq/Coad) for HI antibodies were 1.02 (0.89-1.18) for A/H1N1, 0.93 (0.82-1.05) for A/H3N2, 1.00 (0.89-1.14] for B/Victoria, and 1.04 (0.93-1.17) for B/Yamagata; and 0.98 (0.84-1.13) for anti-Spike antibodies, thus meeting the protocol-specified non-inferiority criteria. The most frequently reported adverse events in both groups were pain at the injection site and myalgia. The 2 groups were similar in terms of the overall frequency, intensity, and duration of adverse events. In conclusion, co-administration of mRNA-1273 booster vaccine with QIV in adults was immunologically non-inferior to sequential administration. Safety and reactogenicity profiles were similar in both groups (clinicaltrials.gov NCT05047770).


What is the context? Updated booster shots against COVID-19 disease are likely to offer more protection as the virus is changing over time.It is important for doctors, other healthcare providers and patients to know whether COVID-19 booster vaccines can be given at the same time as other vaccines recommended for adults.What is new? The results of our study showed that an mRNA-based COVID-19 booster vaccine could be given at the same time as the seasonal influenza vaccine.When given together, both vaccines led to immune responses and had side effects that were similar to those observed when they were given at separate times.What is the impact? The potential benefits of administering more than 1 vaccine during a healthcare visit include improved coverage and a reduced number of doctor visits needed to receive all vaccines.Co-administration of COVID-19 booster vaccines and influenza vaccines could be an attractive option for patients and healthcare professionals.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Adulto , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Virus de la Influenza B , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Estaciones del Año , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e942845, 2024 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND This retrospective study evaluated the effects of specific COVID-19 preventive measures, including the use of medical masks, nucleic acid testing, and patient isolation, on respiratory infections, disease severity, and seasonal patterns among children in Hohhot, located in northern China. Understanding these alterations is pivotal in developing effective strategies to handle pediatric respiratory infections within the context of continuous public health initiatives. MATERIAL AND METHODS At the First Hospital of Hohhot, throat swabs were collected from 605 children with community-acquired respiratory between January 2022 and March 2023 for pathogen infection spectrum detection using microarray testing. RESULTS Among the patients, 56.03% were male, and their average age was 3.45 years. SARS-CoV-2 infections were highest between October 2022 and January 2023. Influenza A peaked in March 2023, and other pathogens such as respiratory syncytial virus and influenza B virus disappeared after December 2022. The proportion of mixed infections was 41.94% among SARS-CoV-2 patients, while other pathogens had mixed infection rates exceeding 57.14%. Before December 2022, the mean WBC count for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae was 8.83×109/L, CRP was 18.36 mg/L, and PCT was 1.11 ng/ml. After December 2022, these values decreased significantly. Coughing, difficulty breathing, running nose, and lower respiratory tract infection diagnoses decreased in December 2022, except for SARS-CoV-2 infections. CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2 peaked around November 2022, influenza A peaked in March 2023, and other pathogens like respiratory syncytial virus and influenza B virus were greatly reduced after December 2022. Inflammatory markers and respiratory symptoms decreased after December 2022, except for SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Preescolar , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , China/epidemiología , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios , Virus de la Influenza B , Gravedad del Paciente
4.
Clin Lab ; 70(3)2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is little data about the performance of multiplex rapid antigen tests (RATs) on the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A (Flu A), and influenza B (Flu B). This study is to evaluate the performance of Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B rapid panel (Abbott Diagnostics, Korea) and analyze the factors influencing its sensitivity. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and stored at the Korea University Anam hospital. In total, 400 residual samples from nasopharyngeal swabs were examined. The diagnostic accuracy of RAT was compared to that of RT-qPCR using the Allplex SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). RESULTS: Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B rapid panel showed the sensitivities of 88.0%, 92.0%, and 100% for SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, and Flu B, respectively, and specificities of 100% for all. The agreements with previously licensed single-plex RATs were shown to be high. In the analysis of variables affecting sensitivity, inappropriate sampling time after symptom onset (STASO) and high cycle threshold (Ct value) were shown to negatively affect the sensi-tivity. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the multiplex RAT is useful for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B, but more clinical studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus de la Influenza B/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Nasofaringe , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e942125, 2024 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446736

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND According to the WHO, up to 650 000 people die each year from seasonal flu-related respiratory illnesses. The most effective method of fighting the virus is seasonal vaccination. However, if an infection does occur, antiviral medications should be used as soon as possible. No studies of drug resistance in influenza viruses circulating in Poland have been systematically conducted. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the drug resistance and genetic diversity of influenza virus strains circulating in Poland by determining the presence of mutations in the neuraminidase gene. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 258 clinical specimens were collected during the 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 epidemic seasons. The samples containing influenza A and B were analyzed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. RESULTS Differences were found between the influenza virus strains detected in different epidemic seasons, demonstrating the occurrence of mutations. Influenza A virus was found to be more genetically variable than influenza B virus (P<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). However, there was no significant difference in the resistance prevalence between the influenza A subtypes A/H1N1/pdm09 (4.8%) and A/H3N2/ (6.1%). In contrast, more mutations of drug-resistance genes were found in the influenza B virus (P<0.001, chi-square test). In addition, resistance mutations appeared en masse in vaccine strains circulating in unvaccinated populations. CONCLUSIONS It seems important to determine whether the influenza virus strains tested for drug resistance as part of global influenza surveillance are equally representative of viruses circulating in populations with high and low vaccination rates, for all countries. Our results suggest that countries with low levels of influenza immunization may constitute reservoirs of drug-resistant influenza viruses.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Polonia/epidemiología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Virus de la Influenza B/genética , Vacunación , Mutación/genética
6.
Molecules ; 29(3)2024 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38338365

RESUMEN

The influenza BM2 transmembrane domain (BM2TM), an acid-activated proton channel, is an attractive antiviral target due to its essential roles during influenza virus replication, whereas no effective inhibitors have been reported for BM2. In this study, we draw inspiration from the properties of cyclodextrins (CDs) and hypothesize that CDs of appropriate sizes may possess the potential to act as inhibitors of the BM2TM proton channel. To explore this possibility, molecular dynamics simulations were employed to assess their inhibitory capabilities. Our findings reveal that CD4, CD5, and CD6 are capable of binding to the BM2TM proton channel, resulting in disrupted water networks and reduced hydrogen bond occupancy between H19 and the solvent within the BM2TM channel necessary for proton conduction. Notably, CD4 completely obstructs the BM2TM water channel. Based on these observations, we propose that CD4, CD5, and CD6 individually contribute to diminishing the proton transfer efficiency of the BM2 protein, and CD4 demonstrates promising potential as an inhibitor for the BM2 proton channel.


Asunto(s)
Ciclodextrinas , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Protones , Ciclodextrinas/farmacología , Ciclodextrinas/metabolismo , Virus de la Influenza B/química , Virus de la Influenza B/metabolismo , Simulación de Dinámica Molecular , Proteínas de la Matriz Viral/química
7.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 430-441, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328858

RESUMEN

AIMS: Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) affect millions each year in the United States (US). Determining definitively the cause of symptoms is important for patient management. Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus (Xpert Xpress) is a rapid, point-of-care (POC), multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended for the simultaneous qualitative detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The objective of our analysis was to develop a cost-consequence model (CCM) demonstrating the clinico-economic impacts of implementing PCR testing with Xpert Xpress compared to current testing strategies. METHODS: A decision tree model, with a 1-year time horizon, was used to compare testing with Xpert Xpress alone to antigen POC testing and send-out PCR strategies in the US outpatient setting from a payer perspective. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000,000 members was modeled, a portion of whom develop symptomatic ILIs and present to an outpatient care facility. Our main outcome measure is cost per correct treatment course. RESULTS: The total cost per correct treatment course was $1,131 for the Xpert Xpress strategy compared with a range of $3,560 to $5,449 in comparators. POC antigen testing strategies cost more, on average, than PCR strategies. LIMITATIONS: Simplifying model assumptions were used to allow for modeling ease. In clinical practice, treatment options, costs, and diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity may differ from what is included in the model. Additionally, the most recent incidence and prevalence data was used within the model, which is not reflective of historical averages due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. CONCLUSION: The Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test allows for rapid and accurate diagnostic results, leading to reductions in testing costs and downstream healthcare resource utilization compared to other testing strategies. Compared to POC antigen testing strategies, PCR strategies were more efficient due to improved diagnostic accuracy and reduced use of confirmatory testing.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Virus de la Influenza B/genética , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Nasofaringe , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Prueba de COVID-19
8.
Euro Surveill ; 29(8)2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38390651

RESUMEN

Influenza A viruses circulated in Europe from September 2023 to January 2024, with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 predominance. We provide interim 2023/24 influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) estimates from two European studies, covering 10 countries across primary care (EU-PC) and hospital (EU-H) settings. Interim IVE was higher against A(H1N1)pdm09 than A(H3N2): EU-PC influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 IVE was 53% (95% CI: 41 to 63) and 30% (95% CI: -3 to 54) against influenza A(H3N2). For EU-H, these were 44% (95% CI: 30 to 55) and 14% (95% CI: -32 to 43), respectively.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Virus de la Influenza B , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estaciones del Año , Hospitales , Atención Primaria de Salud
10.
Cairo; World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2024-02. (WHO-EM/CSR/711/E).
en Inglés | WHO IRIS | ID: who-376425
15.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(3): e0307423, 2024 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349165

RESUMEN

Influenza virus is known to cause respiratory tract infections of varying severity in individuals of all ages. The EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay is a newly developed in vitro diagnostic test that employs cross-priming isothermal amplification (CPA) to detect and differentiate influenza A and B viruses in human nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. The aim of this study is to determine the performance characteristics of the EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay for rapid detection of influenza virus. The limit of detection (LOD) and cross-reactivity of the EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay were assessed. The clinical performance of the assay was evaluated using NP swab samples that were tested with real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV assay. The LOD for the detection of influenza A and B using the EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay was found to be 500 copies/mL. Furthermore, the assay exhibited no cross-reactivity with other common respiratory viruses tested. For the 114 NP swab samples tested for influenza A using both the EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay and real-time RT-PCR, the two assays demonstrated a high level of agreement (κ = 0.963, P < 0.001), with a positive percentage agreement (PPA) of 97.7% and a negative percentage agreement (NPA) of 98.6%. Similarly, for the 43 NP swab samples tested for influenza A and B using both the EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay and Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV assay, the two assays showed a high level of agreement (κ = 0.933, P < 0.001), with the overall rate of agreement (ORA) of 97.7% for influenza A and 100% for influenza B. The EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay demonstrates excellent performance in the detection of influenza A, highlighted by its strong agreement with RT-PCR-based assays.IMPORTANCEThe newly developed EasyNAT Rapid Flu assay is an innovative cross-priming isothermal amplification-based method designed for detecting influenza A and B viruses at point-of-care settings. This study aims to thoroughly assess the analytical and clinical performance of the assay, offering valuable insights into its potential advantages and limitations. The findings of this research hold significant implications for clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Virus de la Influenza B/genética , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Reactividad Cruzada , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Nasofaringe , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/diagnóstico
16.
Cairo; World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2024-01. (WHO-EM/CSR/710/E).
en Inglés | WHO IRIS | ID: who-376424
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...